Winged keels
Jun 8, 2013 15:52:45 GMT
Post by davideso37 on Jun 8, 2013 15:52:45 GMT
In a previous thread there was discussion on keel replacement to improve the performance. One suggestion was to put a spacer between the keel and the hull to lower bulb. After discussing all options with a naval architect we have opted to add winglets to the bulb to try to achieve a similar result.
For background our yacht is a Sun Odyssey 37 but we have upgraded the rig with a 1.7 m taller mast and 0.56 longer boom. This has helped our light air performance and we carry 300 kg of chain in the bilge to improve the heavy air performance. In my opinion we are still not as quick as a Sun Fast 37 which has a slightly deeper lead ballast keel which has less drag.
The purpose of the keel winglets is to reduce the form drag on the very well designed but quite large cast iron bulb and to provide more leeway resistance so we can lean more and get to use our larger sail area.
The project has taken quite some time, firstly for the naval architect to design it and then for me to make a mould for the fibreglass winglets and do the fabrication. In the meantime we decided to upgrade the keel floor structure, not because it was required but because of reports of several upgrades on Sun Fast 37s. We have taken a very conservative approach and added an extra three full size fabricated glass floors of the same dimension as the original three floors, thickened the hull in the floor area and added two more keel bolts. Every keel bolt backing plate now has a floor on both sides. As a result we have doubled the keel floors and doubled the shear area of the backing plates. All this was done in consultation with the naval architect who shares similar views on conservative design of keel attachments.
Today we finally attached to wings to the bulb and next week we will start to see if the journey has been worth the effort.
We do not have grand expectations from the modification but will be satisfied if we can get a 2% improvement in speed around the course in 15 kts of breeze. Under this the extra wetted surface may be a drawback but it is supposed to be offset by the reduced form drag. I have a good record of results against a cohort of competitors and will not make any claims until after we have had a season to experience all conditions.
In the picture you can still see the construction tabs around the edge of the bulb moulding. These will be removed once the two halves are glassed together.
The alternative to the winglets on the bulb would have been a 2.4 metre draft new keel with lead bulb but I could do all the fibreglass work myself at a much lower cost than a new keel and it has been an interesting and entertaining project not only for myself but for the whole crew.
For background our yacht is a Sun Odyssey 37 but we have upgraded the rig with a 1.7 m taller mast and 0.56 longer boom. This has helped our light air performance and we carry 300 kg of chain in the bilge to improve the heavy air performance. In my opinion we are still not as quick as a Sun Fast 37 which has a slightly deeper lead ballast keel which has less drag.
The purpose of the keel winglets is to reduce the form drag on the very well designed but quite large cast iron bulb and to provide more leeway resistance so we can lean more and get to use our larger sail area.
The project has taken quite some time, firstly for the naval architect to design it and then for me to make a mould for the fibreglass winglets and do the fabrication. In the meantime we decided to upgrade the keel floor structure, not because it was required but because of reports of several upgrades on Sun Fast 37s. We have taken a very conservative approach and added an extra three full size fabricated glass floors of the same dimension as the original three floors, thickened the hull in the floor area and added two more keel bolts. Every keel bolt backing plate now has a floor on both sides. As a result we have doubled the keel floors and doubled the shear area of the backing plates. All this was done in consultation with the naval architect who shares similar views on conservative design of keel attachments.
Today we finally attached to wings to the bulb and next week we will start to see if the journey has been worth the effort.
We do not have grand expectations from the modification but will be satisfied if we can get a 2% improvement in speed around the course in 15 kts of breeze. Under this the extra wetted surface may be a drawback but it is supposed to be offset by the reduced form drag. I have a good record of results against a cohort of competitors and will not make any claims until after we have had a season to experience all conditions.
In the picture you can still see the construction tabs around the edge of the bulb moulding. These will be removed once the two halves are glassed together.
The alternative to the winglets on the bulb would have been a 2.4 metre draft new keel with lead bulb but I could do all the fibreglass work myself at a much lower cost than a new keel and it has been an interesting and entertaining project not only for myself but for the whole crew.